S&P TSX Composite Index
Executive Summary
Market Trends
Emerging Issues
Currency – conversion of U.S. peer data into Canadian dollars, paying all directors in U.S. dollar and/or paying in the currency of residence (e.g., U.S. directors in U.S. dollars)
Committee chairs – less differentiation in Committee Chair compensation as the scope of other committees (e.g., HR and Governance) continues to increase relative to the Audit Committee
Equity compensation – granting restricted share units instead of deferred share units to provide increased liquidity once share ownership guidelines are met
Introduction
Southlea’s latest research report summarizes year-over-year director compensation trends among the companies within the S&P/TSX Composite Index. Data reflect 222 companies that disclosed compensation for their board of directors and have been summarized by company size in terms of market capitalization (MC), with a distributed group of companies in each size category. The data were collected by ESGAUGE, a data analytics firm.
Chart 1: Sample by Market Capitalization
Methodology
Data in this report reflect compensation disclosed in 2023 and 2022 proxy circulars representing 2022 and 2021 compensation levels, respectively. Total compensation is estimated based on a standard number of meetings and committee memberships (eight board meetings, two committee memberships and four committee meetings per committee) to provide an apples-to-apples comparison for similar workloads. All data are in the currency reported by each company and are summarized at par (e.g., $1CAD = $1USD). For comparison purposes, we have also provided data for the S&P 500 in USD. Each element is independently arrayed and cannot be added to form the total.
Board Member Compensation
Total board member compensation for the TSX Composite increased at the 50th percentile from $182,000 to $199,000 between 2021 and 2022. Approximately 55% percent was provided in equity v. 45% percent in cash (including the cash retainer and meeting fees where applicable). In 2022, total board member compensation for the S&P 500 was $300,000 USD, approximately 50% percent higher than the TSX Composite, driven by a combination of higher pay levels and larger companies. We note that the difference is less for cash compensation with significantly higher equity retainers driving the overall total board member compensation difference.
Companies continue to move away from providing board meeting fees with 15% of companies (v. 21% last year) continuing this practice, reflecting a persistent trend towards an “all-in” retainer structure.
We continue to see pressures for Canadian companies to increase pay to remain competitive on a North American / Global basis given the increasing number of board members being recruited from outside of Canada, and the higher pay levels found in U.S. companies (refer to table 1 below). This also raises questions on the inclusion of U.S.-based peer companies and how to address currency between Canadian and non-Canadian-based directors (e.g., residency-based pay).
Table 1: Board Member Compensation
Board Member Compensation by Company Size
We observe a clear relationship between company size (in terms of market capitalization) and total board member compensation with an approximate 7% to 14% increase year-over-year depending on size of company. The range of compensation among companies of a similar size represents the diversity of practices depending on the organization’s scope, industry, and relative complexity.
Table 2: Board Member Compensation by Company Size
Chart 2: Board Member Compensation by Company Size
Board Chair Compensation
Of the 60% of TSX Composite companies with a non-executive Board Chair, total Board Chair compensation at the 50th percentile increased from $295,000 to $315,000, representing a 7% year-over-year increase. When expressed as a multiple of board member compensation, Board Chair’s receive 1.6x board member compensation at the 50th percentile, consistent with last year.
In the U.S., approximately 35% of the S&P 500 have a non-executive Board Chair reflecting the increased prevalence of a combined Board Chair and CEO. Non-executive Board Chair compensation is higher than in Canada at $460,500 and represents approximately the same multiple to board member compensation (1.5x) as found in Canada (1.6x).
Table 3: Board Chair Compensation
Chart 3: Board Chair Compensation by Company Size
Committee Compensation
There is mixed usage of additional compensation (retainers and/or meeting fees) for committee member participation with a higher prevalence for Audit v. other committees. Total committee member compensation at the 50th percentile varies by committee at $10,000 for Audit, $8,700 for Compensation / HR and $7,500 for Nominating / Governance with little year-over-year change except for the Compensation / HR committee (up 11% year-over-year). Committee member compensation in Canada remains lower than the S&P 500.
Table 4: Committee Member Compensation
Additional compensation (including Committee Chair retainers and meeting fees) for Committee Chairs is more prevalent, particularly for Audit Committee Chairs. Total Committee Chair compensation at the 50th percentile varies by committee at $25,000 for Audit, $20,000 for Compensation / HR and $15,000 for Nominating / Governance representing the respective workloads of each committee. Committee Chair compensation remained constant year-over-year and is still slightly below the S&P 500.
Table 5: Committee Chair Compensation
Board Demographics
TSX Composite companies tend to have between 6 to 11 board members with an average of 33% female board members (up from 31% last year). In terms of age, 38% of board members are less than 60 years old (up from 34% last year) with about one-half between 60 and 70 years old.
An increasing number of board members have less than a five-year tenure (56% this year and up from 47% last year) with fewer board members on the board for greater than 10 years (21% this year and down from 26% last year).
Board Equity Grants
The majority of TSX Composite companies continue to grant deferred share units (DSUs) with approximately 12% granting restricted share units (RSUs) and 9% granting stock options, with little change on a year-over-year basis. The use of stock options is typically in resource-based and/or recently public companies. In the U.S., S&P 500 companies grant equity primarily in RSUs.
Share Ownership Requirements
Almost all TSX Composite companies have share ownership requirements for board members. Most of these requirements are expressed as a multiple of the cash retainer with a 50th percentile of 3.0x; however, some companies use the equity retainer and/or cash + equity retainer when establishing the multiple which can result in significantly different total dollar amounts that need to be held. Given differences in pay mix (between cash and equity retainers) a multiple based on total compensation (cash & equity retainer) is more reflective of a director’s total compensation and ability to comply with the share ownership requirements.
In the U.S., most S&P 500 companies express the requirement as a multiple of the cash retainer. They also have a higher requirement at 5x the retainer (v. 3x in Canada) but that is on a relatively lower cash portion of the retainer whereas close to 40% of companies apply their requirement to both the cash and equity portion of the retainer.
Table 6: Share Ownership Multiples
About This Author
Ryan Resch, Senior Partner
Ryan is a founder and Senior Partner of Southlea, a GECN Group company. He has over 20 years of experience consulting complex organizations across North America on executive and broad-based compensation including related governance considerations. He is often the named executive compensation consultant representing either the human resources committee and/or management. Prior to forming Southlea, he worked in Willis Towers Watson’s Toronto and Vancouver offices leading many of the practice’s large client relationships.
He leverages this expertise to bring stakeholders together and drive meaningful change aligned with key business and talent priorities. He is known for providing fresh and innovative thinking with his most recent research focused on connecting environmental, social and governance (ESG) with people and pay programs.